In six violent encounters, evidence contradicts Trump immigration officials' narratives

A Reuters review found a consistent pattern of Trump administration immigration officials making false or misleading public statements following violent incidents involving federal agents, only for video evidence, court documents, or medical examiners to later contradict their accounts. In six incidents across Minneapolis, Chicago, and Texas, DHS rushed to portray agents as acting in self-defense and victims as dangerous aggressors — claiming one man brandished a gun when video showed he was holding a cell phone, describing a woman shot five times as having "weaponized her vehicle" when footage told a different story, pursuing a car based on a mistaken license plate scan, and characterizing a detention death as an attempted suicide that was later ruled a homicide by a county medical examiner. A federal judge overseeing one Chicago case wrote that the government's "widespread misrepresentations" made it "difficult, if not impossible, to believe almost anything" officials said, and a former DHS press secretary from Trump's first term told Reuters the administration "doesn't seem to care when they're proven wrong." Critics say the pattern reflects a deliberate strategy to control the public narrative around an aggressive immigration crackdown, regardless of the facts.

Read full article on Reuters

Previous
Previous

H.H.S. Reverses Decision to Cut $2 Billion for Mental Health and Addiction Services

Next
Next

ICE Arrest of a Citizen, Barely Dressed, Sows Fear in Twin Cities