The Administration Misleads & Ignores Courts Most Often in Immigration Cases

The immigration cases—which include conclusions by numerous judges appointed by presidents of both parties—include striking rhetoric quoted in part in the long list below. One judge condemned the “willful disregard” of orders that are defied “willfully and gleefully”; another repudiated the “deliberate evasion” of the administration’s obligations to the court; another merely saw “zero effort to comply”; others puzzled over “shoddy affidavits and contradictory testimony” and why officials were “putting words in people’s mouths” or making claims “untethered to the facts.” Some bluntly determined to put aside the administration’s “nakedly misleading characterizations” and “outright lying.”

Read the full article on cato.org

Previous
Previous

ICE's novel strategy allows for more arrests from inside immigration courts

Next
Next

Pregnant women report medical neglect in ICE detention, rights groups say